GPTZero
CautionWeighs burstiness and perplexity. Lowest reported FP rate (~0.24%), so a high score here is the strongest single warning.
Paste anything you actually wrote. Get a false-positive risk score for GPTZero, Originality.ai, Turnitin AI, and Winston AI — calculated entirely in your browser. We never auto-rewrite your text (no "humanizer") — that defeats the purpose and breaks academic integrity policies.
The history of paper money is older than most people assume. China issued the first widely circulated banknotes during the Song dynasty, almost a thousand years ago. Merchants on long trade routes simply got tired of carrying heavy strings of bronze coins, so they began depositing the coins with trusted houses and exchanging paper receipts instead. When Marco Polo described the practice to a skeptical European audience, the idea sounded fantastical. Yet within four centuries banknotes had crossed every major economy. What changed was not the paper but the institutions that stood behind it. My own grandmother kept a small tin box of 1970s Korean ten-won bills under her bed. She used to laugh that one day even those would be worth nothing — and she was almost right.
Some signals look AI-like. Polished prose and uniform rhythm can trigger detectors even when the author is human.
Diagnostic estimates only — vendors do not publish their detection models. Actual scores will vary.
Your sentence lengths are too uniform. Mix short punchy sentences (5–8 words) with longer, complex ones (20+ words). Human writers naturally vary rhythm; AI defaults to a steady medium.
Rhythm is too even. Drop a deliberate fragment or one-word sentence somewhere. Yes. Like that. This breaks the AI-uniformity signature instantly.
These are heuristic rules, not an automated rewriter. We deliberately do not ship a humanizer — see /guide for why.
Each detector weights different signals — burstiness, vocabulary, repetition. A spread between them is normal.
Weighs burstiness and perplexity. Lowest reported FP rate (~0.24%), so a high score here is the strongest single warning.
Aggressive detector with ~15% reported FP. Punishes generic vocabulary and uniform style harder than its peers.
University-standard. Uses sliding paragraph windows — repeated phrasings and uniform pacing trigger it even after paraphrase.
Ensemble classifier weighting syntactic regularity. Often flags polished, well-edited essays with low variance.
Read the methodology and ethical positioning in the guide, or jump to the FAQ for student-and-teacher questions.